Sonia Gandhi’s predicament
She has to set her house in order first!
Sonia Gandhi was served with a notice from the Election Commission for her use of language”, merchants of death”(maut ke saudagar) in the Gujarat election campaign.
Mr.Narendra Modi’s retaliation justifying the “police encounter deaths” as a response to Sonia Gandhi’s this remark also received the EC’s attention and a notice and Mr.Modi’s reply was also under the EC’s scrutiny. Supreme Court also issued a contempt of court notice.
This time, the EC’s action not only against Mrs.Gandhi but also her deputy Mr.Digvijay Singh. Both the leaders were caught off guard, as it were by the sudden activism of the EC, given the tense atmosphere created by Modi’s high-pitched campaign that left him a long mileage vis a vis the Congress, the main rival for the Gujarat honours.
What surprised the observers was the fact that Sonia Gandhi always looked beyond reproach and also beyond reach for anyone to question her actions closely. So, EC’s swift action caused some flutters and to say the least the Congress was quite unprepared for such a point scoring!
Now, is Mrs.Gandhi justified to use such an expression?
And who coined the term? It is attributed to a Bollywood script writer. In the past Mrs.Gandhi’s speech writers were Mani Shankar Aiyar and Jairam Ramesh. These “wordsmiths” after all have some value? For creating political storms? While the TV news channels played the tapes of the two leaders. This time the new entrant is said to be a non-political person, that only could have helped, it is said, to have such a polarising phrase!
One wonders where the limit to civilised speech is in a public discourse, including in a highly charged election season like the current one.
Though she claims she didn’t mean any individual but only to the Gujarat administration and the establishment. Surprisingly, she hasn’t made her reply public and so there would be some speculation what else she has said to plead her case.
After all the EC is a quasi-judicial body and any notice amounts to an indictment. The speeches of Gandhi and Modi were played out on the TV news channels and the viewers can make their own judgements. Yes, Modi’s speeches have all exceeded the limits of Constitutionalism and decency for any society that cares for certain norms and behaviour. Mrs.Gandhi’s speeches were of course different and they in fact dot refer to Modi directly but nevertheless they were said in an election rhetoric that can’t be taken as a great offence to any civilised listener. May be the EC acted in a sense of great responsibility and it is for the competent authorities to arrive at a conclusion.
The point is that Indian election politics under Narendra Modi had reached a dangerous level.
He seems to imagine he can cross any limit and incite the audience frenzy as he wants. This has to be stopped.
And how this can be done is for all to deliberate.
If courts can help then let them do their duty. The best way of course ideally is for the electorate to throw out such undesirable elements.
But then the undesirable elements are multiplying and in all parties, from the CPI (M) to the DMK, key allies in Mrs. Gandhi’s party’s coalition.