The PMO responds to the letters of the PMO’s grievances Cell!
Also the PMO is active and sensitive to the citizens’ petitions!
Even now the dilemma of Panchayat Raj vs. District Collector’s Raj!

Yet creating rural employment is not so easy. Rural India is a complex web.
The Indian migrants problem is very intricate indeed.

We appeal to the PMO and also the NITI AYOG to consider our views very carefully. Rural India is full of contradictions. There is high political and administrative corruption. Nothing moves without corrupt practices. The party apparatus is the first hurdle.

Party functionaries, from village to the district and why even the upper levels are known to indulge in dubious activities. The government schemes function in a partisan way.
The administrative structure, with petty party cadre seem to be active in interfering with the police to other levels of administration.

There are other traditional socio-economic and cultural hurdles. Now democrat had changed its features. Everyone is a political functionary these days. Our years in the rural media had taught us what the professional economists and experts haven’t taught us.
That is: Every marginal farmer is either debtor and also a litigant.

Even petty piece of land ownership leads the farmer, the marginal and small farmers, and the darlings of urban chatteratti.

‘The enormiity of the Indian migrant problems is going to remain with us for a long time.
Better we create a conducive environment after sometime so that the returned migrants might themselves go for old jobs with high payments.

We did’nt realise how vast is the Indian rural migration population.
Even the Supreme Court didn’t take up their case for the first 50 odd days.

Only when the migrants actually came out in the open and also, tragically left out for themselves India woke up to the Enormity of the problem is likely to persist so long we don’t r really wake up to the rural issues.

Our media kit focused at the rural Indian r realities and we have to shed our urban-biased mindset.

In many States of India hardly any decentralisation of power has taken root.
In the initial years after Independence and also when the voices of such leaders like Mahatma Gandhi and Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru were still resonant we all talked of swaraj and gram Swarj and lastly Panchayat Raj.

Though years rolled on we have forgotten many ideas and values of our freedom struggle and we increasingly fallen for the more material pursuits.

By the year 1967. The Congress party itself, under the Indira Gandhi years things in fact went more wrong paths and we saw many consolidation of power around individual leaders and also the rise of other minor parties and their known ideological proclivities.
The rise of splinter parties, more chauvinistic politics led to minor heroes like the DMK, later AIADMK in TN, the rise of ShivSena in Maharashtra and many other caste and communal parties brought about a new mindset.

There is no point in coming to the present scenario, the Congress party itself went its own way, there is now a family-centric dynastic politics and this has also contributed to the weakening of values.

So, to cut the story short, today inspire of Rajiv Gandhi two important Constitutional Amendments, one on Panchayat Raj decentralisation, not much had changed on the ground level.

Only in Karnataka, one in Kerala under the Communist regime Karnataka under the Ramakrishna Hegde government. A genuine radical change was sought to be implemented.

The recent trends in other states like Tamil Nadu we see a total bureaucratic control and centralisation and concentration of power.

In TN, the state knows better it is the district Collector’s Raj!
So, what sort of rural r realities we see today?
The panchayat bodies are almost dead and gone.

So. We need a whole new way of thinking and imagination. First, we must understand fully the rural realties.

We need a vision, if you so desire a new political and economic ideology.

Politically, we have to reform the.democratic decentralisation. The words might be changed but the understanding must be clear and also open-minded.

You have to understand the changed and changing rural India. The rural youth, we saw in hundreds walking back to their villages, in the migrant trail, all seem to be educated enough to know what the rural realities are there. They we say after sometime would surely go back to their old jobs which are very attractive than what they would get back in their villages.

So, please reform the panchayat raj institutions. Make at least a number of these migrant youth and others back in their villages empowered. Make them panchayat pradhans. Give them the hope of progress with liberalised opportunities, with credit and cash. Make for a liberalised rural society.

Encourage them with moral strength to seize the opportunities for a prosperous rural India. Give them political power and also economic opportunities. Small and medium industries can come up only when their own political and cultural rights are recognised. Caste is a very sensitive issue.

Unless you commit for a clear commitment to a progressive ideology, none would believe. The present day pretensions of a highly unequal society and also an inequitable social order. That is one reason why the traditional parties like the Congress stand discredited.

Anyone listening?

Why mainstream media ignores the agri sector?
Or, for that matter, issues in rural development?

farmer_710x400xtThe mainstream media, mostly the English  language mainstream media writes of issues in agriculture and rural  development, the two high priority  areas where the largest number of people are engaged  is almost pathetic. For quite some time we were fed with stories of farmers’ suicides and the administrative bungles that denied timely help to the very distressed family members of the affected farmers. Only one major newspaper hired a high profile leftist correspondent who went over to the families in the rural areas and
that high strung prose brimming with much rhetoric drew readers. That was in itself a great contribution to point journalism.

But you see we are in India and we don’t have that luxury of the British media, in particular, the famed Guardian newspaper which for a very long time used to have a special correspondent who wrote a regular column about the countryside. But then the British has some snobbishness, they used to imagine the very paradise in the greenery of the countryside.

But we then live in the Indian villages and where there is much illiteracy still and much poverty and very much social segregation. This media is very much village based and village attached, we write not from the capital Delhi but from the rural interior in the South.
So, what we write might not have much relevance in the North and yet we know much of the Indian countryside ,from Rajasthan to West Bengal to much else in the rest of the country where ,we believe, the reality is much the same.

Now, when the rural migration, from the rural countryside to the urban centres have changed the picture of agricultural realities. UP and Bihar are two big states contributing to heavy migration, now even the reality is so changed that much of the migrants from Assam and Bengal to the South has created little islands of mini-Assam as in Kerala and in Karnataka.

The population diversity is now very fast changing to create almost permanent employment in major cities in many new industries, from hotels and catering to domestic help to many other sectors.
The net result is that even in the older states like TN and AP and other Southern states that there is an acute scarcity of labour, more so the farm labour and  the term landless labour is not to denigrate in any manner the grip realities of life in the villages. The point here is that those urban-based newspapers and magazines, some are also in the regional languages and yet they have to function from urban point openly write as though the rural India is what they present in their writings.

No, this is not the total reality! Even the small and marginal farmers with one or two acres of land find it hard to do agriculture for there is no labour available to work on the land. The youngsters had gone away. They are urban-based now, for there is work only there. There is no chance to live back in the village and find year-round work on the small patches of land, mostly dry lands, and also the current realities of demand and supplies in farm products, vegetables and other short-term crops where the price fluctuations are so common that there is no chance for a secure livelihood in the villages.

So, what the urban readers are given as farm news is that only patchy distress stories. So, the news that 92 farmers died from suicide across the Rajasthan state on the eve of the Assembly elections is no news, more so when the statistics where three died in the Hadoti region in the Baran district and also the news item is so heroic, with the local suicide helpline, Hope Helpline at 0744-4333666 is like adding more irony to the distress stories elsewhere. After all how many such stories you can carry in a day when there are other items that are more glamorous that is needed to engage the busy readers!
So, who will summarise and articulate the farming stories and also who would take up the cause of championing the farmer’s priorities, the rural priorities.

It looks agri media business to seem hopeless. How can you compete with the larger media houses, why even the larger ones are struggling already?

The government in the States and at the Centre have big ad budgets but then they have their own priorities. The PM, the CMs have to advertise their own programmes and also ask for votes and so we at the agri media are almost in a hopeless situation!

So, where is our chance to survive? The big corporate in their pursuit of profit-seeking have their own priorities, so they have their Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) obligations, they look to the ruling party and allot their funds!

So, we have to survey it seems with our wits, so to say and unless there is a growing awareness among the wider society, the more enlightened sections of society, all talk of reviving vigour in agriculture and the food sectors, in order to raise Indias score in the Global Hunger Index and also on the Human Development Index would continue to be a lost cause!

So, we invite sensitive readers whoever they are, big or small, to take some extra interest, some commitment on the part of policy makers, to join us in the mission of sensitising public opinion. Agriculture is such a top priority that needs no further labouring of the same points.

Agriculture is so part of the global concerns from environment to climate change to pollution etc.

Food shortage is also, great many minds have warned us ,m looming food crisis in the year 2050 is very likely, with the population growth threatening our very survival.

So, this is a journal for much thought and reflection. Goodbye!

Farmer’s suicides seem unabated, they continue!

Yet, no systematic response is in sight!

Photo30It is easy to blame the government for many of the ills of governance. The Prime Minister is blamed routinely for many of the ills and lack of governance in some critical areas.  Farmers’ continued suicides are not in this category.

Farmers constitute the most weakest part of the Indian economic growth story in the present stage of economic development.
Farm credit has surged from Rs.1 lakh crores in the 2000s to nearly 8.5 lakh crores in 2015-16.

Given the size of the farmers population, also considering that 60 per cent of the Indian people are still dependent upon agriculture for their living, is it too much at all?

We request Mr.Modi, the Prime Minister, to make a drastic change in the unbalanced share of loans in the urban-rural divide!

All recognised farmers, big and small and all recognised farmers must have direct access to bank funds.

That makes Mr.Modi a living god to the millions of farmers who are now subjected to untold oppressions and suppressions.

And the Prime Minister rightly puts his emphasis on development and we at the Vadamalai Media believe in constructive approach even when we want to point out what needs to be done and what can be done in a sector like agriculture.

We feel that the government must think in a systematic manner. There present state of agricultural credit, farm loans directly to farmers is not in keeping with the trends in direct transfer of funds to the weaker sections, to the last man.

There are enough statistics with the government to show that only 13.5 per cent of the farm credit directly goes to the farmers.
This, by any stretch of imagination is far from satisfactory. Also, there is statistics to show that with the farmers heavily in debt, the proportion of debt with the private money lenders is very high, 44 per cent of the debts with the rural households is from the private money lenders.

This needs to be brought down. Also 40 per cent of the farm loans in Maharashtra are disbursed from the urban and metropolitan branches of the banks. It should be obvious to anyone’s common sense that this category of “farmers” are really urban borrowers, mostly non-farmers and also the loans are for non-farming activities only. And these loans are advanced in summer months and not even during the kharif and rabi seasons!

One can go on and on with this sort of highly unsatisfactory state of affairs in the rural set-up. What can be done?

Surely, the government must make fresh surveys wherever they want and they must ascertain the actual number of small and marginal farmers and make a new policy to directly transfer loans to the would be beneficiaries.

And, please look at the functioning of old institutions like the Nabard and also the newly created and we suspect, on-functioning Agricultural Insurance Corporation. Make them all functional.
When there is a rush to start so many insurance companies in the private sector, why not invite some foreign or domestic PSU insurance companies to partner with the agricultural insurance.
Any among of funds allotted to this agri insurance would be a great public service and public investment.

Please take time off, we say to the prime minister, and devote some time, quality time, as they say, to the woes of the rural distress.

Farming is a challenging activity anywhere these days, be it the USA and Europe.

Just now, we read in the London Financial Times that even in France where there has been a bumper wheat harvest and yet, prices fell and the farmers, owning as much as 250 acres (which is small farm there!), is in distress.

That is why in the USA and EU farm subsidies are very hefty payouts!

In India, with all our tall talk, we are depriving our farmers.
At any time in history, it is food production that saves a nation. Indian history is no exception.

So, we say to the government, don’t neglect farmers, rural India where we will have always the very foundations of a strong agricultural prosperity.

Who can give an answer?
There are always either doom stories or boom stories!
When it comes to our villages!
Indian villages would thrive as ever as anyone can look into the future.

Villages have lived in all developed countries. In UK, the glories of the countryside is celebrated. There are any number of legends and folklore!

So too in the continental Europe. Go to any country, Germany or France. There are strong rural communities. There is a strong agricultural base in these countries. So too in other developed countries.

As for the big countries, big geographies, there is no doubt that villages are still their strengths. Russia, China or Japan.
In India, it is an ancient country. Our history is long.

So too our rural side. What is now the critical question is how we look at our rural India. What will be the look, its ethos in the future? Both the short and long-term future?

Surely, the three areas we like to concentrate here are: the village economy. The rural land holding. Second, the rural administration. The Panchayat Raj system.

Third, the rural society, the castes groups, the political formations, and the way the rural society would evolve. As for the rural economy, rural wealth and wealth holding. There will always be the landownership pattern.

After 1799, after Tipu Sultan was defeated, killed in the Sri Rangapattanam battle, the land ownership in the South passed on to British administration. The Ryotwari system created direct link with the government and the peasants.

Today to, the very same system persists, though the extent of land ownership had drastically changed from big landowners to small, marginal land holders.

There is now no legally described big land owners. But there are now a net set of realities that make us to see the emergence of big land owners, who emerged as land grabbers, land buyers, the real estate market today makes any rational discussion of this extremely sensitive and complex subject very tentative and also very secretive.

Certain realities can’t be discussed so openly. The point is there is always in the rural economy a great deal of inequality and also inequity, if you so desire, in the ownership of landed property.

In every village there are only one or two big land owners. Call them by any name you fancy, they are land lords, or big land holders or land owners by so many descriptions.

This unreality of land ownership today has come about through populist politics. There are also as many laws pertaining to the holding of landed property. You ask any land owners, big or small; you can’t get an exact answer to the extent of land he or she owns!
Also, there is the reality that there is a great deal of inequality in the rural society, old or new.

That is as it is. Once you conceded or recognise the existence of big land owners you have to admit there is bound to be inequality. With inequality comes also the question of inequity.

This is only for politicians to discuss and debate. Politicians these days typically are hypocrites. They, the practising politicians are themselves are money makers by dubious means and one way of holding their wealth is to buy land or better still grab others lands though illegal means.

That is how the land grab has become a hot property in states like TN and elsewhere. May be in every state of India!

So, the future of villages, as they are today will continue to be an unequal society.

But to the surprise of many, rural society has always lived in this unequal society, learnt to exist as a cohesive society, in fact, to the point of like a family unit. The villages are like joint families. This, in our view, is the greatest strength and foundation of a village society.

There is much justice, truth and honesty in the lives of village people, unlike in the anonymous urban societies.

In the cities you often don’t know your next door neighbour for years together!

But villages are different. Of course there are now changes here too. Villages are changing. There are urban migration. There are new faces coming into the villages. So, there will still be the rural .highly closely knit rural societies.

So, what is the future of landownership like we must opt for?
In our view we have to encourage having some big land owners to live in the villages. That way the villages acquire some character, some value system, there will be the comfort level for other castes, other lesser economically  viable professions like dhobis, other professions like rural farm labour and other unnamed castes and their traditional professions. The rituals and ceremonies during birth and death and other such occasions, the very fundamental reality of the Sanskrisation of society has to be given a life of its own.

Who are you, be a politician or a reformer to change this tradition?
No one has any right over others. The Indian society would thrive only on some such foundational values. It is tradition, history and social beliefs and convictions, religion, tradition and what have you.

Such forces only would shape Indian villages and their future stability and more so their sustainability!

Then, the newly created Panchayat raj. It is okay so far. But it needs much more radical changes and reforms.In short, let us follow some states like Karnataka where the panchayat raj was given a serious try by Ramakrishna Hegde and it needs further democratisation in decision making at the district and grass roots level.

The third component. Rural development. Land acquisition etc.
Here too we need some deep thinking and new policies to help the rural, district level life more meaningful and more democratic and more freedoms in decision making.

Now it is still an inspector’s raj!
It is still an autocratic rule. All this has to change.

We invite a debate afresh on these very sensitive and critical questions of the future of the Indian villages.

The greatest rural transformation is taking place now!
Increasingly, urban impact, urban opinion might swing opinion in the rest of India?
It is said that the distance between the town and the countryside is narrowing. And narrowing faster these days.

urban-rural-e1365523360411The Up riots at Muzzaffarnagar soon spread to the countryside and it was all in the rural areas. There is now enough to show that half the village households work in non-agriculture occupations. So, what happens in the urban areas, say for riots, and now spread as fast as in the urban centres.  At Independence agriculture was in 60 per cent of the GDP, now it is barely 14%!

More than 58% of the net domestic product is from the non-agricultural sector. There are lately many new facets to the rural urban divide, if there is a divide anymore at all. Economic changes first, then, poltiical changes too next. So, we seem to be living through a time when the very earth seems to have slipped out of the village world.

With the currently charged political environment where we witness  new tensions and communal riots, it is not right to call them even as riots for the riots are associated with certain parties and  groups, the future of the rural economy, the future of life in the strictly village environment might take some more dramatic unforeseen shapes and implications.

Not just in the North but also in the South we see more rural areas getting transformed into urban agglomerates, as they are now called.
Why the land acquisition bill? Why the food security bill at all?
There are enough freebies, from colour TV sets to free laptops that the voters have lost count of the number of free schemes available in any state that goes to the polls.

The very face of rural economy, the agri sector are all poised for some radical change. In fact, rural people, agriculturists in particular or small scale medium industries sectors don’t bother about these changes at all. Even about agriculture the average agriculturist, doesnt bother.

It is again the urban readers, the urban well-off sections, why, it is really the corporate, the bankers and the industrialist and those engaged in the industries  and services, food processing, food exports, imports etc are the ones who are interested in what is happening and what is likely to happen in the agri sector.  Who wants crop estimates?

Who wants data about the reservoirs and dams etc?
Not the ordinary citizens. The government, as it is increasingly seen, is least interested in genuine rural institutions, the co-ops and the other government depts. that directly impacts the lives of the average farmers and villagers. How these rapid changes might impact the outlook of the voters, both the rural and urban voters, is everybody’s concern.

Here too the old ties, the family and ethnic ties, village ties have all given way to new loyalties and new signs of status and authority, respect and other traditional virtues ad values. Superior and inferior, fairness and unfairness have all changed and new forms have come to engaged the consciousness of the new voter-banks!

Yes, alit parties are as many as they are castes and subcastes. The middle classes, you can’t country anymore. Every day you can see new castes coming and claiming new status and new listing in the calendar of the quota politics. TN has the largest quota, 69 per cent. In other states other forms of quota prevail.

21% rural kids go to private schools, mostly to English-medium schools. These families, more aspiring for more dreams, may not be swayed by the food security or land acquisition bills, say observers.
Now it is estimated that nearly 200 Parliamentary constituencies are seen as urban as any.

The There are now more urban areas, more growth in urban centres, less growth, if any, in the rural areas, the next elections might be fought and won(or lost)on the increasingly urban political opinion that swings the rest if India.  With the BJP taking a new assertive, even militant stand on a range of very sensitive and controversial issues, what change for peaceful change?

In times of crisis situations a why even bloodshed, as in the muzaffarnagar riots, we have to have new articulations for calming the tensions and resort to violence.People are now awaiting the time, 2014 elections not far away and who knows what would be the over-all motivation for change.

May be we can chart out a list.Corruption is people fed up with.
So, if the party in power is insensitive to corruption on such wide scale where the very top leadership is accused of participation and non-action, then that could be a legitimate factor for change. So too the rise in prices, inflation.

It is becoming everyday nightmare, the petrol price, diesel price rise and food prices rise.These are impacting the imagination of the rich and the poor. It is a pity there is no effort to modify this outrage about inflation.

As Prof. Galbraith, a friend of India, said long time ago in one of his lectures he delivered at the Indian International Centre, that people need to work harder, as the Puritans, one religious group of great fame, the work ethics has been changing through the years and if people don’t work harder, then, it is inevitable there must be some incentive for working harder. That is the price incentive. It is inflation in simple terms.  Certain level of price rise, inflation is reasonable and it is part of the tendency of modern man to search for more leisure and less work. As in France!

But we have to realise that no economy can grow unless there is strong incentive to work hard and produce wealth. In China we found people working harder and their progress, compared to India, is faster. Any leaders who visited and came back told us so?

No! Why? May be sheer ignorance or lack of honesty!
We, Indians have to look into ourselves. Are we honest to ourselves? We ask the current crop of the politicians? You want all impediment to be removed be it RTI, or Criminal offences or other electoral malpractices?

Anyway, people have become more alert and they might show us the way.